Once again...you show your ignorance. Take every Spidey comic book ever made...take every Spidey newspaper comics ever made...take every Spidey novel ever made...take every Spidey cartoon every made...take all the live action Spidey ever made...take all the Spidey fan fiction ever made.
All that material...and they could only come up with 6 hours of story for film...pathetic.
I'm not making anything up. You seem to be in heavy denial. And if you try telling me all that shit doesn't equal thousands of hours of material...then that just proves you are full of shit.
Yeah, that's what I thought....Scown.
Last edited by Kinectamaniac; 06-01-2012 at 03:02 PM.
ITT: A thousand hour of source material = A thousand hours of a feature film.
Feature film! Which is of course what I was referencing. Do you know how movies are made?
And remember none of this is the point. If a studio doesn't think they have a good story on a project....what would you have them do? Make the movie anyways because it will be profitable? Or move on to what they think might be a better idea? No seriously? Which sounds more intelligent?
ITT: Toruk thinks 1000's of hours worth of material=6 hours of feature film...and sees nothing wrong with that.
Did I ever say the 1000's of hours of material should equal 1000's of hours of feature film? No I didn't. See now you're just making shit up.
Six hours dude...only six hours they could come up with...from all that material. C'mon dude...you KNOW that's pathetic.
Last edited by Kinectamaniac; 06-01-2012 at 03:12 PM.
No what would be pathetic is releasing a sequel just to get sales even though you don't love the story. What as a consumer would you prefer? The studio to go with what they think is a better story on a new project...or an inferior one in the Spiderman universe? The issue wasn't could they make a story....the issue was could they make a story they liked.
I hope I'm your secret Santa this year...I am so gonna send you a huge bag of Pecans...generic at that.